The average Unix user may not even have used Emacs before, but isĬertainly used to the Windows bindings. In the days of KDE and Gnome, many of the key- and mouse bindings areĬonverging towards something that is much more similar to Windows than I wonder whether it is such a good idea to make Emacs look-and-feel theĭefault on Unix: Back in the old days, it may have been reasonably toĪssume that an average Unix user would be used to Emacs keybindings. Independent of the confirmation quesition discussed before: > I did that on Windows, but not under Unix, where the Emacs look and feel is Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix? #TEXMACS UNIX SOFTWARE#Beyond mathematics, mathematical software systems are becoming indispensable tools in many branches of science and technology.Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix? texmacs-dev Conversely, mathematical research often motivates developments of new algorithms and new systems. Mathematical software systems are used to construct examples, to prove theorems, and to find new mathematical phenomena. This congress was devoted to all aspects of mathematical software, whose appearance is - in our opinion - one of the most important events in mathematics. For the first time, this 2006 edition of ICM is held in Spain (see: for details), and so is ICMS 2006. Since its inception, this congress has been a satellite event of the International Congress of Mathematicians - ICM, the world’s largest conference on mathematics, celebrated every four years since the edition of 1900 in Paris, where David Hilbert presented his 23 famous problems. second edition of this congress, which follows up the successful ICMS 2002 held in Beijing, China. We cordially invite you to visit the ICMS 2006 website where you can find all relevant information about this interesting event. This volume contains the outstanding collection of invited papers and refereed papers selected for the Second International Congress on Mathematical Software, ICMS 2006, held in Castro Urdiales, Spain, September 1-3, 2006. We will provide a detailed analysis of these experiments. #TEXMACS UNIX UPGRADE#In particular, the syntax corrector that we have implemented enables us to upgrade existing documents and test our parsing grammar on various books and papers from different sources. An important related topic, which will also be discussed at length, is the automatic correction of syntax errors in existing mathematical documents. As long as all formulas remain sufficiently correct, the editor can then both operate on a visual or semantic level, independently of the low-level representation being used. In the background, we continuously run a packrat parser, which attempts to con- vert (potentially incomplete) formulas into content markup. To go short, we continue to allow the user to enter formulas in a visually oriented way. #TEXMACS UNIX VERIFICATION#When looking more closely, there are two important subproblems: making documents written by humans at least syntactically understandable for computers, and the formal verification of the actual mathematics in the documents.In this paper, we will focus on the first problem, as implemented in recent versions of TeXmacs. Currently, there exists a big gap between formal computer-understandable mathe- matics and informal mathematics, as written by humans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |